| Name | Comments |
| 1451 | Bryan Langbein | I am against this new bylaw. N2H4W4 |
| 1452 | C L Wenzel | I am against the new bylaw proposal. |
| 1453 | K Wenzel | I am against the new bylaw proposal. |
| 1454 | Kevin Schmalz | The current bylaw has all the teeth necessary to deal with any issues. Equal consideration of neighbours is important including those who have issues with smoke/firepits. Perhaps only a manufactured firepit would limit the size and common sense, courtesy should prevail.
|
| 1455 | melissa duncan | It is our right to have safe fires in our own backyards. Just because some ppl are irresponsible and careless should not affect everyone else who actually abide by the rules. Some ppl love to complain!! Fires are therapeutic for anxiety |
| 1456 | Kim Lebrun | I am against this new bylaw proposal. |
| 1457 | This signature has been deleted. |
| 1458 | This signature has been deleted. |
| 1459 | Aurel Jr Lebrun | N2C 1Z6 |
| 1460 | K Russell | N2H 2E9 I am against the new bylaw proposal. This is just another cash grab. We should be able to do whatever we want in our own backyards. After all don't we pay property tax??? |
| 1461 | S Graham | Please do not ban the family time we enjoy Keep the firepits! N2A 4J3 |
| 1462 | Rob W. | N2G 3B6 |
| 1463 | Guy Maltby | I am against this and don't even start with the air quality issue unless you are prepared to ban lawn mowers , single people in vehicles and smoking city buses |
| 1464 | This signature has been deleted. |
| 1465 | Chantal Stieler | 602 Brittania Cr.
Kitchener N2R 0B1 |
| 1466 | Mary Ross | Please do not ban firepits. They are fun and relaxing and good for families who cannot get out of town to enjoy campfires. |
| 1467 | allana barry | Strongly against new bylaw!! |
| 1468 | Brad Churchill | The current bye law is fine. As a firefighter most responses are due to noise or a few people burning when and what they shouldn't be. Neighbour disputes are normally the real issue. Smoke from ordinary combustibles on a non windy or smog day dissipate. |
| 1469 | Brad Churchill | 22 Doonbrook place Kitchener . Lots of good info and assistance if required. Good luck! How about a 1 time urban burn permit $20. if you violate take it away. |
| 1470 | Deb & Brad Soehner | I can understand issues with postage stamp properties and out of control fires and burning of noxious substances to be concerning, however any issues with responsible adults having a backyard fire within bilaw restrictions should be allowed to continue. |
| 1471 | Gail Taylor | N2P 1R2
6 fires at $10 each! Less than 1 fire per weekend and what does the $10 fee support? The permit would be wasted for us if the wind takes the smoke to a neighbour's house, we check by lighting paper 1st. "BAN the BAN" |
| 1472 | Sue Benoit | Yes we are responsible people! |
| 1473 | Dale Paff | N2E2X1 As the fireman early stated,most complaints are due to spiteful neighbors! I agree! Don't let a minority ruin some great family enjoyment! stated before, leave the by-law the original way it was. Sounds like the fee is a cash grab to me! |
| 1474 | Mark Smith | N2G 2T2 |
| 1475 | Leanne Hughes | N2G2T2 |
| 1476 | Carl Dulle | |
| 1477 | Christa Haughey | |
| 1478 | Christa Haughey | 115 Manchester Rd
Kitchener On
N2B1A3 |
| 1479 | Emmanuel Brown | |
| 1480 | Kyle Solie | 115 Manchester Rd
Kitchener On
N2B1A3 |
| 1481 | Sydney Haughey | 115 Manchester Rd
Kitchener On
N2B1A3 |
| 1482 | Kevin Haughey | 115Manchester Rd
Kitchener On
N2B1A3 |
| 1483 | Mike Armstrong | |
| 1484 | Mike Armstrong | N2E 1P1 |
| 1485 | Bob Geldart | N2H-3N6 I would be willing to bet for a lot of these people this isn't the first issue they have had with their neigbhours and it will not be the last. Charge the speeder, don't ban driving. |
| 1486 | Pam Geldart | Back yard fires are enjoyable for those of us who don't go camping or to the cottage on the weekend. It is a nice way to spend time with family and friends. As long as you are not inconsiderate I don't see any problem with back yard fires. |
| 1487 | Lisa Paff | N2E 2X1, I don't agree with the new proposed bylaw. We pay taxes and should be able to have fires,why pay more to enjoy our property!
I don't agree with pay more for enjoying our property, if your doing fire pits what's next fire places in homes?
|
| 1488 | Konstantin | 60A Montcalm dr.
Kitchener |
| 1489 | Edmund | address: N2H4C5 |
| 1490 | Andrea Massel | |
| 1491 | James Hollinger | This is nothing more than a money grab by our city. You aren't stopping the people from careless burning, your only making us all pay a fee for it. Nowhere in the amendment did I see a spark retardant cover must be used. The careless people are the ones ha |
| 1492 | This signature has been deleted. |
| 1493 | Brian Walker | |
| 1494 | Darryl La haie | Postal Code: N2N 0A3
Cash grab that is all this is. City of Kitchener why waste time having to write these permits out when you did not have to do this before. Keep things the way they are so that families are able to spend time within the comforts of their own homes/backyards. |
| 1495 | Meagan Manion | N2H 3M2 - this is terrible, the people that were on the news and in the record live behind my house. GO INSIDE OR CLOSE YOUR DAMN WINDOWS
money grab |
| 1496 | Adrian Weerheim | I live in the same district as my son and although I do not do pit fires I agree with the petition...just greed on the part of the city...AW |
| 1497 | Ian Graham | Zehr... It's time for you to move on. After years of dealing with your crap when you supported Manulife jack hammering/construction at all hours in our neighborhood and the coal tar fiasco, this fire pit law has to be the ultimate low. And $10?!?! WTF!!!! |
| 1498 | Peter Beyerle | nanny states are getting out of hand |
| 1499 | This signature has been deleted. |
| 1500 | Heidi Ramseyer | It would be nice to set rules that reflect that the vast majority that follows them and not to let the few bad apples spoil it for everyone else.
Fine those that break the existing bylaw. The $10 per fire results in very expensive smores!
Thanks |